Analysis of the Constitutional Court's Decision Regarding the Age Limit for Presidential and Vice-Presidential Candidates in Connection with the Principle of Nemo Judex in Causa Sua
Keywords:
Constitutional Court, Judicial Ethics, Procedural JusticeAbstract
The purpose of this thesis research is to examine the violation of the principle of Nemo Judex in Causa Sua. The principle of Nemo Judex in Causa Sua by Constitutional Court Judges in Constitutional Court Decision Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023. The research method used in this study is normative juridical research. The approach employed is a legislative approach and a literature study. The data collection tools used are primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The data collection procedure is a document study. The data analysis used is qualitative analysis. The results of the study indicate that there was a violation of the Principle of Nemo Judex In Causa Sua in the determination of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023 concerning the age limit for Presidential and Vice-Presidential Candidates set by the Constitutional Court. As a Constitutional Court judge, Anwar Usman should have realized that the Constitutional Court Decision Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023 would have an impact on himself and his family. Therefore, as a Constitutional Court judge, he should have resigned in accordance with the Principle of Nemo Judex In Causa Sua, which is one of the fundamental principles in case handling. The application of this principle is very important to ensure that the decision can be reached fairly and without any intervention. The Constitutional Court Decision Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023 is a final and binding decision. Although the decision is final and immediately effective, the Constitutional Court can still be declared "invalid and has no legal force", due to the fact that the decision was not read out in public.
References
Agung Bahayu Adji, ‘Konstitusionalitas Perubahan Usia Calon Presiden Dan Calon Wakil Presiden Dalam Negara Hukum Demokrasi’, Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, 1 (2024)
Agus Susanto, ‘Kewenangan Judisial Badan Pengawas Pemilu Dalam Perspektif Asas Nemo Judex in Causa Sua’, MLJ Merdeka Law Journal, 1.2 (2020)
Amalia, Riska Ari, Gatot Dwi Hendro Wibowo, and Kaharudin, ‘Konflik Asas Ius Curia Novit Dengan Asas Nemo Judex in Causa Sua Dalamputusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 005/Puu-Iv/2006’, Education and Development, 3 (2019)
Amran Anshary Kelilauw, and Zuhad Aji Firmantoro, ‘Analisis Legal Standing Dan Konsistensi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Pengujian Materiil UU Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 Tentang Pemilihan Umum: Studi Kasus Putusan No. 90/PUU-XXI/2023’, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum,Humaniora, Dan Politik, 2 (2024)
Arpiansyah, Arya, Lauddin Marsumi, and Salmawati, ‘Analisis Yuridis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 90/PUU-XXI/2023 Tentang Batas Usia Calon Presiden Dan Calon Wakil Presiden Republik Indonesia”,’ Journal Lex Philosophy (JLP), 5.2 (2024)
Aryo Wasisto, ‘Dampak Pelanggaran Kode Etik Penyelenggaraan Pemilu Terhadap Kepercayaan Publik’, Pusaka, 16.3 (2024)
Ellydar Chaidir, ‘Perlunya Pengawasan Terhadap Kode Etik Dan Perilaku Hakim Konstitusi Dalam Rangka Menjaga Martabat Dan Kehormatannya’, Uir Law Review, 1.2 (2017)
Husnu Abadi, Pemikiran Kodifikasi Hukum Administrasi Negara Indonesia (UIR Press, 2004)
M. Husnu Abadi, Bunga Rampai Politik Hukum: Dari Sistem Pemilihan Umum Sampai Hak-Hak Ekonomi Sosial Budaya, (CV. Budi Utama)
Muhammad Ridho Prima Ndaru, Analisis Legal Standing Pemohon Tentang Syarat Calon Presiden Dan Wakil Presiden Perspektif Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi” (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor: 90/Puu-Xxi/2023, Skripsi (Universitas Islam Negeri Prof. K.H. Saifuddin Zuhri, 2024)
‘Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor: 90/PUU-XXI/2023’
Raji, Agatha Augustin, and Frangky Jonatan, ‘Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 90/PUU/XXI/2023 Tentang Persyaratan Batas Usia Pencalonan Presiden Dan Wakil Presiden’, JLEB: Journal of Law Education and Business, 2.2 (2024)
Titik Triwulan, Pokok-Pokok Hukum Tata Negara (2006)
Wibowo, Mardian, ‘Mahkamah Konstitusi Dan Pengujian Undang-Undang’, Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 11.27 (2004), pp. 1–6, doi:10.20885/iustum.vol11.iss27.art1
Wulandari, Dinda Agustin, and Winarno Budyatmojo, ‘Pengujian Undang-Undang (Judicial Review) Dalam Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi’, Souvereignty, 1.4 (2022), pp. 692–700
.png?raw=true)
Focus and Scope .png?raw=true)
Publication Ethics .png?raw=true)
Editorial Team .png?raw=true)
Reviewers .png?raw=true)
Policies .png?raw=true)
Privacy Statement .png?raw=true)
Submit Your Paper .png?raw=true)
Author Guidelines .png?raw=true)
Indexed .png?raw=true)
Journal History .png?raw=true)
Author Fees 
