Implementation of Bawaslu's Duties and Authorities in Resolving 2024 Election Violations in Indragiri Hulu Regency
Keywords:
Bawaslu, General Election, ViolationsAbstract
Implementation of Bawaslu's Duties and Authorities in Resolving 2024 Election Violations in Indragiri Hulu Regency. The main problem in this study is how Bawaslu implemented its duties and authorities in resolving 2024 election violations in Indragiri Hulu Regency and what obstacles Bawaslu faced in resolving 2024 election violations in Indragiri Hulu Regency. This research uses an empirical research method, namely a legal research method that functions to see the law in a real sense and examine how the law works in the community environment. The results of the study can conclude that in carrying out the duties and authorities of Bawaslu in resolving violations of the 2024 election in Indragiri Hulu Regency, namely preventing and taking action against election violations, supervising the implementation of the stages of election administration, resolving election process disputes and conducting evaluations of election administration supervision, there are significant challenges. There are 8 forms of alleged violations encountered by Bawaslu, namely, 6 reports were stopped, 1 finding was followed up, and 1 finding was stopped (SP3). Bawaslu's resolution of election violations is carried out in accordance with the mechanisms regulated in Law No. 7/2017 concerning elections, whose process includes several stages for each type of violation by supervising and ensuring that all processes run fairly and in accordance with the law. Bawaslu's obstacle in resolving 2024 election violations in Indragiri Hulu Regency is the limited personnel of the Gakkumdu Center. While the number of cases to be handled is quite large, Bawaslu, in the process of receiving reports, must be accompanied by other agencies such as the Prosecutor's Office so that from the beginning there is an understanding and the report meets the elements of an election crime, insufficient time to handle election violations, obstacles when handling ASN neutrality, a limited budget, difficulty completing evidence, weak enforcement of sanctions and low public participation in reporting violations and other obstacles such as areas that are too remote, extreme location access and the lack of a special courtroom. Based on 8 forms of alleged violations, including 6 reports and 2 findings found, only 1 finding was followed up, namely the case of violation of ASN neutrality (Number 001/Reg/TM/PL/Kab/04.05/III/2023) was followed up because it was proven to violate the provisions of ASN neutrality. This report was decided directly by Bawaslu by bringing the reported party to the process of being followed up by KASN; this is an obstacle for Bawaslu when handling ASN neutrality.
References
Abdul Djalil dkk, ‘Implikasi Sistem Pemilihan Umum Indonesia’, Jurnal Recht Vending Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 3.1 (2014)
Abdurrahim, ‘Alur Dan Proses Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pelanggaran Pemilu Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 7 Tahun 2019’, Unizar Recht Journal, 2.1 (2023)
Anita S. Trampi, ‘Problematika Penanganan Pelanggaran Kode Etik Badan Ad Hoc Di Daerah Kepulauan’, JDIH KPU, 7.2 (2022)
Armala, Yuli, and M. Yasir, ‘Implementasi Electronic Traffic Law Enforcement (E-TLE) Di Wilayah Hukum Kepolisian Resor Bojonegoro’, Hukum, 5.1 (2022), pp. 32–44 <https://ojs.ejournalunigoro.com/index.php/JUSTITIABLE/article/view/405>
Ma’ruf, Et.al, ‘Makna Kedaulatan Rakyat Dalam UUD NRI Tahun 1945: Dari Gagasan Sampai Implementasi’, Jurnal Majelis Media Aspirasi Konstitusi Edisi 4, 2019
Muhammad Ja’far, ‘Eksistensi Dan Intergritas Bawaslu Dalam Penanganan Sengketa Pemilu’, Jurnal Legal Review, 2.1 (2019)
Muhammad Junaid, ‘Pidana Pemilu Dan Pilkada Oleh Sentra Penegakan Hukum Terpadu’, Jurnal Ius Constituendum, 5.2 (2020)
Nuswantoro Setyadi Pradono, ‘Aparatur Sipil Negara Dalam Pemilu 2019’, Jurnal Analis Kebijakan, Pusat Pembinaan Analisis Kebijakan Deputi Kajian Kebijakan Lembaga Administrasi Negara, 3.1 (2019)
Pramana, Setiya, Muhammad Junaidi, Zaenal Arifin, and Kadi Sukarna, ‘Kewenangan Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia Dalam Penanganan Kasus Keterlibatan Aparatur Sipil Negara Dalam Pemilihan Umum’, Jurnal Usm Law Review, 3.2 (2020)
Ramon Azmi Pratama, ‘Problematika Penyelesaian Perkara Tindak Pidana Politik Uang (Money Politic) Dalam Pemilihan Umum’, Journal Of Criminal, 1.2 (2020)
‘Wawancara Dengan Dedi Risanto, Tanggal 2 Januari Pukul 11.24 Wib, Di Kantor Bawaslu Indragiri Hulu.’
‘Wawancara Dengan Ronaldi Ardian, Tanggal 2 Januari Pukul 14.15 Wib, Di Kantor KPU Indragiri Hulu.’
‘Wawancara Dengan Ronaldi Ardian, Tanggal 2 Januari Pukul 14.26 Wib, Di Kantor KPU Indragiri Hulu.’
‘Wawancara Dengan Salestia Deni, Tanggal 2 Januari Pukul 11.15 Wib, Di Kantor Bawaslu Indragiri Hulu.’
‘Wawancara Dengan Yusuf Hidayatullah, Tanggal 17 Februari Pukul 14.45 Wib, Di Kejaksaan Negri Indragiri Hulu.’
‘Wawancara Penulis Dengan Salestia Deni Di Kantor Bawaslu Indragiri Hulu’
.png?raw=true)
Focus and Scope .png?raw=true)
Publication Ethics .png?raw=true)
Editorial Team .png?raw=true)
Reviewers .png?raw=true)
Policies .png?raw=true)
Privacy Statement .png?raw=true)
Submit Your Paper .png?raw=true)
Author Guidelines .png?raw=true)
Indexed .png?raw=true)
Journal History .png?raw=true)
Author Fees 
