Legal Analysis of the Role of the Tanjungpinang District Attorney's Office in Carrying Out Law Enforcement Efforts to Return State Finances from Corruption Crimes Committed by Convicts
Keywords:
Corruption crimes, Prosecutor's Office, Return of state financesAbstract
Corruption in Indonesia is an extraordinary crime that causes significant losses to state finances. Law enforcement in recovering state losses is a primary focus, with the prosecutor's office playing a crucial role as investigator, prosecutor, and enforcer of judges' decisions. This study aims to analyse the role of the Tanjungpinang District Attorney's Office in recovering state losses from corruption and to identify obstacles encountered in the process. The research method used is an observational approach with a field survey through in-depth interviews and descriptive-analytical data analysis with an inductive conclusion-drawing pattern. The results show that the Tanjungpinang District Attorney's Office plays a significant role in recovering state losses through a mechanism for paying compensation by convicts, as in case No. 05/Pid.Sus-TPK/2019/PN.TPG, where the restitution is carried out in stages until it is fully paid and deposited into a state account. However, the implementation of this role is not free from various obstacles, including legal factors, limited facilities and infrastructure, obstacles to the community's legal culture, and difficulties in asset tracking because most of the convict's assets are transferred to other parties. These findings indicate the need for strengthened regulations, increased capacity of officials, and cross-institutional collaboration to support the effective recovery of state funds from corruption. Therefore, the role of the prosecutor's office is not only strategic in law enforcement but also crucial for efforts to recover state losses and maintain the integrity of the public financial system.
References
Undang-Undang No 11 tahun, Tentang Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia, 2021
Adji, Andriyanto Seno, Korupsi Dan Penegakan Hukum (Jakarta: DiaditMedia, 2009)
Amanda, Boby, ‘Penyita Aset Pelaku Tindakpidana Korupsi Oleh Kejaksaan Tinggi Dalam Pengembalian Kerugian Negara’, Bidang Hukum Pidana, 5, 572
Arief, Muladi dan Barda Nawawi, Teori-Teori Dan Kebijakan Hukum Pidana (Bandung: Alumni, 1998)
Din, R.Bayu ferdian dan Mohd, ‘Penetapan Kerugian Negara Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi’, Law Journal, 2 No.3 (2018), 1
Dkk, Sarah hersriavita, ‘Upaya Pengembalian Kerugian Keuangan Negara Dari Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Oleh Kejaksaan Negri Sukohajo’, Pascasarjana Hukum Uns, VII,no 1 (2019)
Fadlil Altansa, diding rahmat, ‘Analisis Yuridis Kewenangan Jaksa Dalam Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik’, Lex Laguens : Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 2 (2024), 6
Gunawan, Indra, ‘Pelaksanaan Penyitaan Barang Bukti Oleh Jaksa Terhadap Tersangka Dalam Perkara Korupsi Yang Ditinjau Undang-Undang No 20 Tahun 2001 Tentang Tindak Pidana Korupsi’, Normative Fakultas Hukum Universitas Al-Azhar, 59–169
‘Hasil Wawancara Kasi Pidsus Roy Huffington Harahap, S.H.,M.H’
‘Hasil Wawancara Kasi Pidsus Roy Huffington Harahap, S.H.,M.H’
‘Hasil Wawancara Pejabat Fungsional Bambang Wiratdany,S.H’
Husein, Yunus, Negeri Sang Pencuci Uang (Jakarta: Pustaka Juanda Tigalima, 2008)
Louis hangrai, rudepel dkk, ‘Upaya Jaksa Selaku Eksekutor Dalam Pengembalian Kerugian Keuangan Negara Hasil Tindak Pidana Korupsi’, Ilmu Hukum Dan Tata Negara, 168
M.Yanuar, Purwaning, Pengembalian Aset Hasil Korupsi (Bandung: Alumni, 2007)
Ramadhan, Muhammad Hariyo, ‘Peran Upaya Jaksa Dalam Pengembalian Kerugian Tindak Pidana Korupsi’, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 1 No. 1 (2022), 23
Saidi, Muhammad Djafar, Hukum Keuangan Negara (Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2011)
Sughondo, Tandyo, ‘Peran Kejaksaan Dalam Pengembalian Kerugian Negara Akibat Tindak Pidana Korupsi’, 12, 48
Sukmadinata, Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (PT Remaja Rosdakarya, 2005)
Susanti, M.musa dan heni, ‘Penalaran Hakim Tentang Penyertaan Tindak Pidana Dalam Kasus Korupsi Pengadaan Videotron’, Jurnal Yudisial, 15 No.1 (2022), 35