Legal Analysis of the Decision of the Constitutional Court's Honorary Council Number 2/MKMK/L/11/2023 Concerning Violations of the Code of Ethics of Constitutional Court Judges
Keywords:
Constitutional Court; Judicial Independence; Violation of the Code of EthicsAbstract
The Constitutional Court (MK) is a constitutional guardian institution with the primary authority to review laws against the 1945 Constitution. However, the MK's independence has come under scrutiny after Chief Justice Anwar Usman was found guilty of a serious ethical violation in MK Decision Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023 concerning the age limit for presidential and vice-presidential candidates. This case was examined through the decision of the Constitutional Court's Honorary Council (MKMK) Number 2/MKMK/L/11/2023, which is the focus of this research study. The problem formulation studied is the MKMK's legal considerations in deciding the ethical violation case and its implications for the validity of MK Decision Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023. This research uses a normative or doctrinal legal method with a library study approach that examines primary and secondary legal materials. The analysis shows that the Constitutional Court (MKMK), in its considerations, affirms the finality of the Constitutional Court's decision but ignores flaws in the decision-making process that have been proved to violate the code of ethics, such as conflicts of interest, intervention by other judges, and leaks of information from the Judges' Deliberation Meeting (RPH). These violations violate the principles of impartiality, independence, and integrity of constitutional judges. The implications of the MKMK ruling indicate that this ethical violation undermines the legitimacy of Constitutional Court Decision No. 90/PUU-XXI/2023 and erodes public trust in the constitutional courts. This situation creates a negative precedent for internal oversight of judges and emphasises the need for fundamental reforms in the constitutional court system, particularly through strengthening oversight mechanisms, enforcing discipline, and strengthening judicial professionalism. Therefore, this study emphasises the importance of striking a balance between the finality of decisions and ethical accountability to maintain the credibility of the Constitutional Court as a guardian of the constitution and a pillar of the rule of law.
References
Abdullah, Pertimbangan Hukum Putusan Pengadilan (PT Bina Ilmu Offset, 2008)
‘Anwar Usman Ajukan Banding Atas Putusan PTUN’, Kompas.Com
Asshiddiqie, Jimly, Format Kelembagaan Negara Dan Pergeseran Kekuasaan Dalam UUD 1945 (Jakarta: UII Press)
———, Hukum Acara Pengujian Undang-Undang (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2011)
Badriyah, Siti Malikhatun, Penemuan Hukum Dalam Konteks Pencarian Keadilan (Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, 2010)
Ekatjahjana, Widodo, Negara Hukum, Konstitusi, Dan Demokrasi: Dinamika Dalam Penyelenggaraan Sistem Ketatanegaraan Republik Indonesia (Jember: Jember University Press, 2015)
Fuady, Munir, Dinamika Teori Hukum (Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia, 2010)
Huda, Ni’matul, Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia, Raja Grafindo Persada (Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2015)
Ilham, Muhammad, ‘Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Menegakkan Keadilan Konstitusional Di Era Modern’, Legal Standing Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 8 No.2 (2024), 474
Mappiasse, Syarif, Logika Hukum Pertimbangan Putusan Hakim (Jakarta: Kencana, 2015)
Martitah, Mahkamah Konstitusi Dari Negative Legislature Ke Positive Legislature (Jakarta: Konstitusi Press (Konpress), 2016)
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud, Penelitian Hukum Edisi Revisi (Jakarta: Kencana Prenada, 2014)
Mulyadi, Lilik, Hukum Acara Perdata Menurut Teori Dan Praktik Peradilan Indonesia (Jakarta: Djambatan, 2005)
Mulyana, Idris Rachmawati Dan Imam, Penemuan Hukum Nasional Dan Internasional (Bandung: Fikahati Aneska, 2012)
Peraturan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 Tentang Majelis Kehormatan Mahkamah Konstitusi
Peraturan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 2 Tahun 2021 Tentang Tata Beracara Dalam Perkara Pengujian Undang-Undang
Putusan Majelis Kehormatan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 2/MKMK/L/11/2023, Hlm. 381
Rahardjo, Satjipto, Sosiologi Hakim, Dalam Buku Sisi-Sisi Lain Dari Hukum Indonesia (Jakarta: Kompas, 2023)
Rishan, Idul, ‘Konsep Pengujian Formil Undang-Undang Di Mahkamah Konstitusi The Concept Of Judicial Review Of The Legislative Process in the Constitutional Court’, Konstitusi, 18 No. 1 (2021), 3
Salman, Otje, Filsafat Hukum (Perkembangan Dan Dinamika Masalah) (Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2009)
Setiawan, Zenal, ‘Peran Mahkamah Konstitusidalam Menjaga Stabilitas Hukum Di Indonesia’, Jurnal Cerdas Hukum, 2 No.2 (2024), 24
Siahaan, Maruarar, Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia (Jakarta: Konstitusi Press, 2006)
Suparto, Ellydar Chaidir &, ‘Perlunya Pengawasan Terhadap Kode Etik Dan Perilaku Hakim Konstitusi Dalam Rangka Menjaga Martabat Dan Kehormatannya (The Need For Supervision On Constitutional Court Judges’ Code Of Ethics & Behavior In Order To Uphold Their Dignity And Honor)’, Uir Law Review, 01 No.02 (2017), 111
Sururi, Ramdani Wahyu, Putusan Pengadilan (BANDUNG: Cv. Mimbar Pustaka, 2023)
Suteki, Desain Hukum Di Ruang Sosial (Yogyakarta: Thafa Media, 2013)
Syahrani, Riduan, Buku Materi Dasar Hukum Acara Perdata (Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2000)
Tempo.co, Nasional, Begini Kronologi Ketua MK Anwar Usman Dilaporkan Hingga Disidang MKMK
Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2022 Tentang Perubahan Kedua Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 Tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan
Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 Tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman
UUD 1945
Zulkifli Bahri, Ellydar Chaidir, Yusri Munaf, Aryo Akbar, ‘Diskursus Indepedensi Kekuasaan Kehakiman’, Konstitusi Jurnal Magister Ilmu Hukum, 15 No.1 (2021), 39
Zulkifli, Suparto &, ‘Kedudukan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Hukum Ketenagakerjaan (Kajian Terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 37/PUU- IX/2011)’, Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 52 No.1 (2022), 79